There is an old saying: “Don’t judge a book by its cover.” Unfortunately the same saying does not apply to movies. Audiences can be drawn or diverted by the artwork splashed over a 27×41 inch canvas. Bright colors, sexy people, and exotic places have all been used to entice viewers into theater seats since the inception of Hollywood. While these items seem essential to selling a movie, they’ve lacked the bang that once helped to create the buzz in movie theaters.
Movie posters serve a very similar purpose to book covers. They tell you the title of the movie, who made it, and provide an image to best describe what lies ahead. Of course, movie posters take it one step further and give you information as to who is in the piece and may even reveal a bit of the plot. The main difference between the two is the lack of imagination on the movie end. What I mean is that a book is completely dependent on your imagination. A writer may be extremely descriptive. However it is up to the reader to create that image in his or her mind. As for a movie, the image is not dependent on the viewer whatsoever. The image is dependent on a person you may never see, the director. This difference automatically makes judgment essential. A book cover is almost never an indication of what lies beneath the cover. Whereas a movie poster is almost an exact replica of what you’ll see on screen. The colors are similar, the scene is similar, even the composition is similar.

Imagine walking into a movie theater to see Gone With the Wind. The bright reds and yellows fill the famous poster. A sense of romanticism jumps off of the paper just as it does off of the screen. Now imagine that you sat in the movie theater and Gone With the Wind had turned out to be a dark drama with heavy blues and pale grays. The audience would be confused and disappointed. They sat down to see Gone With the Wind but instead saw Donnie Darko.
This is what is happening the modern day movie posters. We are no longer receiving an idea of what we will see. Instead we are occasionally being duped into viewing something entirely different from what we expect. Imagine picking up a Harry Potter book only to find out it’s really The Da Vinci Code. Part of this is due to the reliance on character posters. These are posters that focus more on characters within the movie than the movies themselves. The only problem with this is that they create an attachment that may not be rewarded later on in the movie.

My favorite example of this is the character poster for Diane Kruger in Inglourious Basterds. Her character sees far less screen time than any of the others yet her poster makes it appear as if she is a main player.
The confusion doesn’t end there. The other deception that has become commonplace is the misuse of names. Many times a famous director, actor, or writer will be thrown onto the poster even though they have little to do with the production itself. Most of the time they simply gave money. However, their name is used to entice fans to see something that is far from what they would expect from that name. A recent culprit of this deception has been Peter Jackson. While he lent some assistance to the film District 9 you would believe that he made the movie himself from the size of his name on the poster. Unfortunately this is far from the truth.

Movie posters have become more about deception and less about presentation. I understand the need for an occasional lie. However this has become common place in theaters across the country. New names have been unable to catch on since they are continually suffocated underneath the successes of past artists. While I do understand the enormous selling potential of the established artist, it is equally important to groom the budding artist that will eventually replace the incumbents.